Loading…
State boards of nursing set first-time NCLEX pass rate minimums for program approval. See thresholds, measurement periods, and consequences for nine states.

NCLEX pass rate standards by state are set by each board of nursing, and they decide whether a prelicensure program keeps its approval. Most boards compare first-time NCLEX results against a fixed floor, commonly 75 or 80 percent, or against the national average for the same program type. This article sets out what several boards require, how each measures it, what happens below the line, and how the two main accreditors treat the same number.
A board of nursing approves a program so that its graduates may sit for licensure. First-time NCLEX performance is the most direct public measure of whether that approval is warranted, because it is standardized, reported by the testing service, and comparable across programs. Boards therefore write a minimum into rule or statute.
The table below lists only the boards whose rule or statute text was reviewed for this article. It states the first-time pass rate expected, the period over which it is measured, and the consequence that the text describes. Other states vary, and rules are amended often, so treat the table as a starting point and confirm the current text with your own board.
| State | Threshold | Measurement period | What the rule describes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 80% of first-time NCLEX-RN candidates (22 TAC 215.4) | Examination year; status reviewed every two years | Self-study below 80%; warning after two consecutive years; conditional approval after three; withdrawal if 80% is missed in the following year |
| Florida | No more than 10 percentage points below the national average for comparable programs (s. 464.019) | Calendar year | Probation after two consecutive years, with a remediation plan and board appearance; termination if not met after probation and any one-year extension |
| California | 75% of first-time candidates (16 CCR 1431) | Academic year | Assessment and written report after one year; board-approval visit after two consecutive years; warning with intent to revoke is possible |
| Illinois | 75% of first-time examinees (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1300.340) | Annual | Written warning after one year; probation after two consecutive years; reevaluation two years after corrective strategies, with possible withdrawal |
| Kentucky | 80% of first-time test takers (201 KAR 20:360) | Calendar year, graduates testing within 12 months | Site visit if the average is below 80% for three consecutive years; process toward withdrawal if deadlines are missed |
| Ohio | Below 95% of the national average for first-time candidates (rule 4723-5-04) | Fourth consecutive year | Provisional approval for a period of time |
| Arizona | 80% of graduates taking the exam for the first time (R4-19-206) | Within 12 months of graduation | The rule page reviewed states the requirement but not the consequences |
| Pennsylvania | 80% of first-time examinees (49 Pa. Code 21.33b) | Examination year; the 80% tier applies from October 1, 2010 | Provisional approval for a full-approval program that fails the section 21.33b rate |
| North Carolina | 90% of the national first-time pass rate for the licensure level (21 NCAC 36 .0120) | Calendar year ending December 31 | Written into the definition of full approval in the board's 2024 revised rules |
Texas gives the clearest example of a long runway. The rule counts first-time NCLEX-RN candidates within an examination year and requires 80 percent. A program below that figure submits a self-study that evaluates the factors affecting graduates and describes corrective measures. Two consecutive years below 80 percent can bring a warning, three can bring conditional approval, and approval may be withdrawn if the program is still under 80 percent in the examination year after conditional placement.
Florida replaces a fixed floor with a relative one. A program is compared with the national first-time average for programs of the same type: bachelor's professional, associate professional, diploma professional, or practical. Two consecutive calendar years more than ten points below that average place it on probation, and the director must appear before the board with a remediation plan that includes benchmarks. The board may grant one extra year if the program met most of its benchmarks, and otherwise must terminate the program.
California and Illinois both use 75 percent. California asks for a written report after one year below it and a board-approval visit after two consecutive academic years, while Illinois issues a written warning after one year and probation after two.
Ohio, Florida and North Carolina tie the standard to the national average, so the effective floor moves when the national rate moves. Deans planning for the 2026 transition should read nclex 2026 test plan what changed alongside their own board's rule.
Accreditation runs separately from state approval, but the two use similar numbers. ACEN's 2023 Standards, Criterion 5.3, ask programs to examine aggregate licensure pass rate data from the regulatory agency. The most recent annual pass rate, or the mean for the three most recent years, must meet at least one of three tests: 80 percent or greater for all first-time test-takers; 80 percent or greater for all first-time test-takers and repeaters; or at or above the national mean for the nursing program type.
CCNE's 2024 Standards, Key Element IV-C, state that a program demonstrates a licensure pass rate of 80 percent in any one of four ways. The rate for each campus or site and track must be 80 percent or higher for first-time takers in the most recent calendar year, for all takers in that year, for first-time takers over the three most recent calendar years, or for all takers over those three years.
In Canada, provincial and territorial regulators approve nursing programs and set their own review standards. No Canadian thresholds were verified for this article, so none are stated; obtain the current standard from your regulator.
ngnsimulation offers unscripted AI patient encounters inside an EHR-style chart, including spoken OSCE practice, adaptive study and quizzing with a placement check, and faculty-facing competency analytics, and it runs alongside an existing LMS. Programs can see the options at the pilot process or review the cost model at the ROI estimator.
Everything we write about is built into products you can try today.